Industry News
"Cisco, You Are Really Screwing Up Here" Says Security Researcher
Raven Alder Takes Cisco to Task Over Its Legal Tactics vs Michael Lynn
Aug. 1, 2005 04:00 AM
Security officials at Cisco have released a patch to fix the Internet Operating System (IOS) problem that resulted in 'Ciscogate' T-shirts going on sale last week in Las Vegas, after Michael Lynn — who gave a controversial presentation on Cisco security (or, rather, insecurity) at the Black Hat Security Conference — was the subject of a permanent injunction preventing him from using any Cisco code in his possession for further reverse engineering or security research or presenting the same material at the DEF CON hacker convention which followed Black Hat.
Lynn, who has an extensive background in embedded systems, including kernel development and whose research interests include signals intelligence, cryptography, VoIP, reverse engineering, "and any protocol designed by committee," had recently been concentrating his research focus on securing critical routing infrastructures. As a result, his Black Hat talk was on how the Cisco IOS — the most widely deployed network infrastructure operating system — has been perceived as impervious to remote execution of arbitrary code from stack and heap overflows...but isn't.
Lynn provided an architectural overview of IOS and explored the feasibility of code execution against Cisco routers.
This is where Cisco moved in. Wishing to curtail a sudden spate of buffer overflow exploits against the world's most widely deployed network infrastructure OS, Cisco immediately sought to silence Lynn on the basis that the information he was disseminating was "not in the best interest of protecting the Internet" and sure enough Lynn and his attorney eventually agreed to a permanent injunction that prevents him from using any Cisco code in his possession for further reverse engineering or security research.
Raven Alder (pictured), a senior security consultant and senior network engineer and speaker at the DEF CON hacker
convention which followed Black Hat, then took up the issue, summarizing Lynn's findings and discussing potential vulnerabilities in Cisco's IOS that could be used to compromise the networking giant's products.
She said (to Cisco): "Hiding your head in the sand is not going to help; suing researchers is not going to help — Cisco, you are really screwing up here." The audience applause suggested Cisco would need to do a great deal to get back on cordial terms with the security research community, so the news that the company has now patched the flaw — even though it comes a day after the close of DEF CON 13 rather than while it was still running in Las Vegas — should be a good first step.
In its Security Advisory, Cisco says:
Cisco Internetwork Operating System (IOS) Software is vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) and potentially an arbitrary code execution attack from a specifically crafted IPv6 packet. The packet must be sent from a local network segment. Only devices that have been explicitly configured to process IPv6 traffic are affected. Upon successful exploitation, the device may reload or be open to further exploitation.
Cisco has made free software available to address this vulnerability for all affected customers.
About Security News DeskSYS-CON's Security News desk trawls the world of security for news of software, hardware, products, and services that seems likely to be of interest to infosec professionals and summarizes them for easy assimilation by busy IT managers and staff.
#9 |
True, but... commented on 2 Aug 2005
There are outstanding issues on Cisco's 2900 switches that have been unfixed there for years.
|
#8 |
InfoPoint commented on 2 Aug 2005
For the record, Lynn did not disclose the details of this vulnerability at all. The presentation was merely a demonstration that IOS was exploitable just like any other OS.
|
#7 |
Raven Alder commented on 1 Aug 2005
I don't work for True North any more -- sorry. Please edit the article to reflect that; I don't know how True North would feel about being associated with my controversial talk. I deliberately didn't name my current employer, since I wasn't talking under their banner and wasn't sure if they wanted to be associated with my opinions on this matter.
|
#6 |
SecureGuy commented on 1 Aug 2005
I hope Cisco reveals the full technical details of this problem as quickly as possible. The only reason I use Cisco is for the hardware. The software is closed-source and I have to trust Cisco to keep it secure. They dropped the ball completely.
|
#5 |
I disagree with CISCO's position and believe that every effort should be made to release this information. The more it becomes available, the sooner CISCO will fix the problem.
|
#4 |
FairPlay commented on 1 Aug 2005
The (fixed) exploit Lynn mentioned was merely an example of how to get on the box, but there are obviously going to be more ways to do that and quite likely someone already knows some of them. He also explains that while this is not the end of the world, the hardware abstraction Cisco is pursuing will make this type of attack work on many more routers.
|
#3 |
backfire commented on 1 Aug 2005
Cisco's attempts to keep this one quiet has merely resulted in various hackers working through the weekend to investigate the vulnerability further!
|
#2 |
Michael Lynn just wanted the fame behind this exploit. Sounds like he is first a crook and secondly a major-league jerk.
|
#1 |
DangerMouse commented on 1 Aug 2005
Raven is right. Because of the way it has (mis)handled this, all that Cisco has achieved is that people aren't going to care to report vulnerabilities to it. Lynn should have been thanked, not sanctioned.
|