yourfanat wrote: I am using another tool for Oracle developers - dbForge Studio for Oracle. This IDE has lots of usefull features, among them: oracle designer, code competion and formatter, query builder, debugger, profiler, erxport/import, reports and many others. The latest version supports Oracle 12C. More information here.
In many cases, the end of the year gives you time to step back and take stock of the last 12 months. This is when many of us take a hard look at what worked and what did not, complete performance reviews, and formulate plans for the coming year. For me, it is all of those things plus a time when I u...
CALGARY, Nov. 12, 2012 /CNW/ - Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX: BNG) ("Bengal" or the "Company") today announced its financial and operating
results for the three and six months ended September 30, 2012. The
Company focused on drilling during the quarter, spending $10 million to
pursue its successful drilling program in Australia.
FISCAL Q2 2013 HIGHLIGHTS:
100% Drilling Success at Cuisinier: Since March 2012, Bengal has drilled four oil producers, resulting in a
drilling success rate of eight for eight in the Cooper Basin of
Australia. The Company is currently producing 325 barrels of oil per
day (bopd) (net to the Company) from two of the newly drilled wells,
under Extended Production Test, while certain regulatory and capacity
constraints limit full production from all the wells. The following
presents the current status of the Company's Cuisinier wells.
The Company is currently trucking its production to a nearby terminal.
The operator of the field is progressing plans for facilities upgrades
and pipeline connection to a large facility at an adjacent field that
should handle production from all wells in the field. The operator is
also applying for a Petroleum Lease ("PL") that will allow all the
wells in the field to produce at their productive capacities. The
Company expects regulatory approval and facilities upgrades to be
completed in the quarter ending June 30, 2013.
Productive Capacity (Net to Bengal)
Cuisinier 1, 2 and 3
125 bopd (aggregate)
Shut-in, awaiting Petroleum Lease
Shut-in, awaiting tie-in
Cuisinier 5 and 6
325 bopd (aggregate)
Barta North and Cuisinier North 1
75 bopd (aggregate)
Shut-in awaiting tests and tie-in
Cuisinier Reserves Increase Substantially: An independent reserves update of the quantity of oil reserve volumes
contained on Company lands within the boundaries of the Barta
sub-Block, of Authority to Prospect ("ATP") 752 onshore Australia in
the Cooper/Eromanga Basins in the State of Queensland effective
September 30, 2012, prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.
recognized 717,000 proved barrels (an increase of 904%), 1,550,000
proved plus probable barrels (an increase of 269%) and 7,512,000 proved
plus probable plus possible barrels (an increase of 614%) to Bengal.
The net present values discounted at 10% amount to $16 million for
proved, $37 million for proved plus probable and $164 million for
proved plus probable plus possible.
Company's New Rig Drills First Well at Tookoonooka: The Company's recently purchased drilling rig, Bengal 1, has been fully
commissioned and, on October 5, 2012 commenced drilling of the first
well on the Company's 100% owned ATP 732P Permit ("Tookoonooka") in the
Cooper Basin. The first exploration well in the Company's Tookoonooka
drilling campaign, Caracal-1, has been cased as a potential oil
producer awaiting testing results.
Bengal Reports Financial Results: The Company reported that revenues in the three and six months ended
September 30, 2012 amounted to $437,000 and $935,000, respectively
compared to $1,017,000 and $2,336,000 respectively in 2011. The lower
revenues resulted from production reductions primarily related to
expiration of Extended Production Tests for the Cuisinier 1, 2 and 3
wells; as mentioned earlier, the regulatory approvals (expected in the
quarter ending June 30, 2013) will allow all the wells in the Cuisinier
Field to produce at their productive capacities. The net loss for the
three and six month periods amounted to ($845,000) or ($0.02) per share
and ($1,056,000) or ($0.02) per share, respectively compared to
($4,247,000) or ($0.08) per share and ($5,308,000) or ($0.10) per
share, respectively. The 2011 losses were impacted by an impairment
loss related to the drilling of two dry holes in 2011 and 2008. The
Company spent $10,299,000 in the three-month period ended September 30,
2012 and $17,625,000 in the six month period ended September 30, 2012
related to the drilling of four Cuisinier wells, the acquisition of the
Rig, seismic acquisition in Australia and India and preparation for
drilling the Caracal-1 well.
For more information on the Company's operational activities and
permits, refer to Bengal's website at www.bengalenergy.ca.
Financial and Operating Summary
$000s except per share, volumes and netback amounts
Three Months Ended September 30
Six Months Ended September 30
Natural gas liquids
% of revenue
Operating & transportation
Cash from (used in) operations:
Per share ($) (basic & diluted)
Funds from (used in) operations:(2)
Per share ($) (basic & diluted)
Per share ($) (basic & diluted)
Natural gas (mcf/d)
Natural gas liquids (boe/d)
Total (boe/d @ 6 mcf:1 bbl)
Operating & transportation
Netback is a non-IFRS measure. Netback per boe is calculated by dividing
the revenue and costs in total for the Company by the total production
of the Company measured in boe.
Funds from operations is a non-IFRS measure. The comparable IFRS measure
is cash from operations. A reconciliation of the two measures can be
found in Bengal's management's discussion and analysis for the quarter
ended September 30, 2012.
Bengal offers an attractive portfolio of both lower-risk and high-impact
drilling opportunities. Increasing production from new wells drilled at
Cuisinier is expected to drive operating income and set the stage for
future development. Potential near-term exploration drilling success on
permit ATP 732P could create further momentum. The Company also offers
long-term plays in India to potentially add value in 2013 and onward.
The Company will continue to evaluate accretive production acquisition,
exploration and corporate transaction opportunities within and around
the Company's core areas.
Bengal has filed its consolidated financial statements and management's
discussion and analysis for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 with
Canadian securities regulators. The documents are available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com or by visiting Bengal's website at www.bengalenergy.ca.
Bengal Energy Ltd. is an international junior oil and gas exploration
and production company with assets in Australia and India. The Company
is committed to growing shareholder value through international
exploration, production and acquisitions. Bengal trades on the TSX
under the symbol BNG. Additional information is available at www.bengalenergy.ca.
Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains certain forward-looking statements or
information ("forward-looking statements") as defined by applicable
securities laws that involve substantial known and unknown risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond Bengal's control. These
statements relate to future events or our future performance. All
statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward
looking statements. The use of any of the words "plan", "expect",
"prospective", "project", "intend", "believe", "should", "anticipate",
"estimate", or other similar words or statements that certain events
"may" or "will" occur are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such
forward-looking statements are based on management's estimates,
opinions, and assumptions at the time the statements were made,
including assumptions relating to: the impact of economic conditions in
North America, Australia, India and globally; industry conditions;
changes in laws and regulations including, without limitation, the
adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and changes in how
they are interpreted and enforced; increased competition; the
availability of qualified operating or management personnel;
fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign exchange or interest rates;
stock market volatility and fluctuations in market valuations of
companies with respect to announced transactions and the final
valuations thereof; and the ability to obtain required approvals,
extensions, permits and leases from regulatory authorities. We believe
the expectations and assumptions reflected in those forward-looking
statements are reasonable but, no assurances can be given that any of
the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire
or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that Bengal will
derive from them. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained
herein include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: facility
upgrades and pipeline tie-ins and the impact thereof; the application
for the PL, including the timing and impact thereof; the timing of
receipt of regulatory approvals and the impact thereof; impact of
Cuisinier production on operating income; impact of drilling success on
the ATP 732P. The forward-looking statements contained herein are
subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may
cause Bengal's actual financial results, performance or achievement in
future periods to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied
by, these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to,
risks associated with: the failure to obtain required regulatory
approvals or extensions, or leases; failure to secure required
equipment and personnel; changes in general global economic conditions
including, without limitations, the economic conditions in North
America, Australia, India; increased competition; the availability of
qualified operating or management personnel; fluctuations in commodity
prices, foreign exchange or interest rates; changes in laws and
regulations including, without limitation, the adoption of new
environmental and tax laws and regulations and changes in how they are
interpreted and enforced; the results of exploration and development
drilling and related activities; imprecision of reserve and resource
estimates; unexpected decline rates in wells; wells not performing as
expected; the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and
external sources; and stock market volatility. Readers are encouraged
to review the material risks discussed in Bengal's Annual Information
Form under the heading "Risk Factors" and in Bengal's annual MD&A under
the heading "Risk Factors". The Company cautions that the foregoing
list of assumptions, risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. The
forward-looking statements contained in this news release speak only as
of the date hereof and Bengal does not assume any obligation to
publicly update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances,
except as may be require pursuant to applicable securities laws.
Barrels of Oil Equivalent When converting natural gas to equivalent barrels of oil, Bengal uses
the widely recognized standard of 6 thousand cubic feet (mcf) to one
barrel of oil (boe). However, a boe may be misleading, particularly if
used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 mcf: 1 bbl is based on
an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the
burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as
compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy
equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be
misleading as an indication of value.
Non-IFRS Measurements Within this release references are made to terms commonly used in the
oil and gas industry. Funds from operations, funds from operations per
share and netbacks do not have any standardized meaning under
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and previous
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are referred to as
non-IFRS measures. Funds from operations per share is calculated based
on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding consistent
with the calculation of net income (loss) per share. Netbacks equal
total revenue less royalties and operating and transportation expenses
calculated on a boe basis. Management utilizes these measures to
analyze operating performance. The Company's calculation of the
non-IFRS measures included herein may differ from the calculation of
similar measures by other issuers. Therefore, the Company's non-IFRS
measures may not be comparable to other similar measures used by other
issuers. Funds from operations is not intended to represent operating
profit for the period nor should it be viewed as an alternative to
operating profit, net income, cash flow from operations or other
measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with IFRS.
Non-IFRS measures should only be used in conjunction with the Company's
annual audited and interim financial statements.
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a w...
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every real-life scenario that a Kubernetes user might encounter? How do you leverage advanced scheduling techniques to shape and describe each scenario in easy-to-use rules and configurations?...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should migrate, but when. Enterprises have embraced the outsourcing of where their various applications are stored and who manages them, saving significant investment along the way. Plus, the clou...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNati...