Product Review
CapeConnect Two for J2EEby Cape Clear
CapeConnect Two for J2EEby Cape Clear
Nov. 30, 2001 12:00 AM
Two distinct initiatives have come to the forefront as means
by which applications can be presented as Web-based services:
Microsoft's .NET and the J2EE platform. Application servers
and toolsets are beginning to tailor themselves to the Web
services paradigm as the concept matures. One such product
is Cape Clear's CapeConnect Two for J2EE.
CapeConnect provides an environment in which Java and
J2EE components may be presented as Web services
accessible via SOAP calls, defined by WSDL, and
cataloged by UDDI. Figure 1 illustrates
CapeConnect's architecture. SOAP clients access
the CapeConnect Web Services Platform, which
routes requests to the appropriate enterprise component.
This provides the capability to leverage the existing
investment in enterprise technologies with minimal
modifications to those systems.
Components of CapeConnect
CapeConnect consists of three major components:
The CapeConnect Gateway, essentially the message broker,
receives all SOAP client requests and forwards the messages
to the XML engine.
The XML engine converts the incoming SOAP requests
into Java method calls, routes them to the appropriate
enterprise components, and converts the results back into
SOAP messages.
Exceptions are handled through SOAP faults.
The J2EE engine is a fully-compliant Enterprise Java
container that may be used to serve EJBs. Alternatively,
CapeConnect fully integrates with BEA's WebLogic 5.1 and 6.0
application servers, which may be used in place of the provided container.
Future versions of CapeConnect will include integration with the
iPlanet family of application servers and IBM's WebSphere.
Working With CapeConnect
Installation and Configuration
The installation process for CapeConnect is simple. I've installed it
on a Windows 2000 Pentium III machine with 256Mb of RAM; versions are
also available for Linux and Solaris. At install time, the choice
between using the provided J2EE engine and integrating with WebLogic
for serving EJBs is presented. Integrating with WebLogic requires a
few simple steps to establish communication between the servers prior
to creating services. Once installed, CapeConnect is ready for use
with example applications and for deploying custom components. For
this review, I've elected to use the WebLogic integration option.
Supporting Web Services
CapeConnect Two for J2EE exposes stateless session EJBs and standard
Java classes as services available through SOAP calls. To do so, the
developer deploys Java classes and Enterprise beans with CapeConnect
either in lieu of a separate application server if the provided
container
is being used, or, if integrated with WebLogic, as a supplement to
the normal deployment process. CapeConnect then generates the stubs
and XML translations required to handle requests. Optionally, the
developer may generate a WSDL profile for the object being
deployed.
Two formats of SOAP action fields are supported by
a proprietary format recommended for clients that
exclusively access CapeConnect services, or a custom-defined format
providing flexibility to clients communicating with multiple server
environments. If the custom format is
used, CapeConnect requires that WSDL be generated for the
components deployed.
Creating Web Services
I've created a simple movie management system using EJBs deployed on
WebLogic 6.1. It allows users to create and update a catalog of their
personal collections of movies and videos. The system contains a
single stateless session EJB to provide the external interface and a
BMP entity bean to manage data persistence.
Once the beans are deployed on WebLogic, CapeConnect must be
configured to route SOAP requests to and from the stateless session
EJB acting as the interface mechanism. The first requirement is the
location of the application server that hosts the components. An XML
configuration file manages the mappings between services and their
containers. During installation, if integration with WebLogic was
specified the connection to the server is already established in the
configuration file. Additional instances may be added by editing the
file manually. Once the location of the EJB container is specified,
the CapeConnect console may be used to add the individual application
object. The information provided in the entry for each service
includes the service name, the JNDI name for the associated object in
its container, the server on which it resides, and whether the
service requires a secure connection from the client. If no WSDL is
required, clients may begin requesting the deployed Web service.
Otherwise, WSDL may be generated for deployed objects through a
wizard.
SOAP Clients with Cape Clear SOAPDirect API
Although it supports custom SOAP messages, CapeConnect provides a
proprietary API called SOAPDirect. The API is intended to simplify
the development of Web services clients that communicate exclusively
with services exposed by CapeConnect. It isolates the details of SOAP
messages from developers to reduce the learning curve and time needed
to create service clients.
Creating a SOAP Client
Creating SOAP clients with SOAPDirect is very straightforward. The
first step in the process is to create a request object and add any
associated parameters. The developer is required to have the URI for
the desired service available in order to construct the request
object. The URI includes the application name specified in the
configuration console and the JNDI name of the object being
requested. There are three mechanisms to handle parameters for a
request.
- Simple parameters, such as Strings, Integers, etc., may be
added to the request through overloaded add methods that support the
various Java data types.
- Array parameters may also be passed to the request from
additional overloaded methods that receive an array value of the
various Java data types.
- Generic container classes handle more complex, custom
structures. This container class holds field names and values for the
custom object in the request, which is then mapped to the method
signature of the called component.
For the movie example, the lookup method requires two parameters. The
first is a primitive integer value that represents the unique number
of the movie. This is set with the appropriate add method on the
request. The second parameter is a custom user object specific to the
movie manager system. In order to pass the user along in the request,
an instance of SDComplexType is created. Each property of the user is
added to the SDComplexType object, which in turn is appended to the
request object.
When the request is invoked, the CapeConnect Gateway receives the
request and sends it off to the XML engine where it's interpreted and
sent to WebLogic 6.1 for processing. WebLogic's response is received,
translated back into a SOAP reply, and sent through the gateway to
the calling client as an SDReply object.
From the SDReply object, data values can be extracted via the
accessor methods structured not unlike the accessor methods on a JDBC
Resultset object. The reply object also provides an accessor to an
SDComplexType object that maps any complex object returned from the
EJB. In the case of the movie management system, a customized movie
object was returned with all the properties of a movie. By providing
the name of the desired property, the values may be retrieved and
manipulated in subsequent processing.
Summary
CapeConnect Two for J2EE provides an effective solution for extending
enterprise components including EJBs, CORBA objects, and standard
Java classes to the outside world as Web services. It's a very simple
package to install and administer. The provided SOAPDirect API has a
reasonable learning curve that isolates developers from the
intricacies of SOAP. It also provides the flexibility to work with
any variant of SOAP and makes the creation of WSDL definitions
extremely simple. With
its integration into WebLogic, and future integrations with iPlanet
and WebSphere, CapeConnect allows existing investments to be
leveraged and extended with minimal impact.
About Brian BarbashBrian R. Barbash is the product review editor for Web Services Journal. He is a senior consultant and technical architect for Envision Consulting, a unit of IMS Health, providing management consulting and systems integration that focuses on contracting, pricing, and account management in the pharmaceutical industry.